Data | Coal demand-supply mismatch, rising prices and mounting debts plague thermal power generators

With a coalsupply demand gap, and international coal prices rising, cashstrapped thermal power generators are left with critical stocks

With a coalsupply demand gap, and international coal prices rising, cashstrapped thermal power generators are left with critical stocks

On June 10, India’s power demand touched a record high of 211 GW even as the coal shortage continued with coal stocks available only for eight days. In the last two months, as temperatures soared and the economy recovered, the power demand breached the 200 GW level on several occasions. But the coal stock position at power plants remained worrisome. Consequently, the Ministry of Power sprang into action. To bridge the gap between shortage in domestic supply and increasing demand, powergenerating companies or ‘gencos’ were directed to use imported coal for 10% of their requirement, failing which their domestic supplies would be cut.

How did India get here?

India is the second largest producer of coal, with reserves that could last up to 100 years. Despite that, year after year, the shortage of coal supplies continues to be an issue. Why does India have a recurring power crisis? As seen in chart 1, the domestic production of coal stagnated between FY18 and FY21, but revived in FY22. The power demand too surged owing to economic recovery and hotter weather conditions. In a press release published on May 27, the Ministry of Power noted that “despite efforts to increase the supply of domestic coal, there is still a gap between the requirement of coal and the supply of coal.” Until FY20, domestic sources contributed to about 90% of the power sector’s coal receipts; the remaining was filled by imports. But by FY22, the reliance on imports dwindled to 3.8% which built pressure on domestic supplies. As chart 2 shows, the coal imported by power plants declined to 27 MT in FY22 from 66.06 MT in FY17. Coal imported for blending purposes by power plants that run on indigenous coal declined to 8 MT in the last financial year, from 19.7 MT in FY17. Past data show that importing coal for blending has always seen few takers. A bulk of imports were made by power plants designed for imported coal. Notably, their share of imports too saw a decline of 60% in FY22 since FY17. Out of 15 such importbased power plants in India, five had little or no coal stock as of June 15. This dip in imports can be attributed to the skyrocketing prices of coal in the international markets. (chart 3). The price of imported coal is nearly 56 times higher than the domestic supply. It is in this scenario that the Power Ministry asked the gencos to import coal. However, states are wary of using imported coal as it would raise the cost of power substantially. The shortfall in domestic supplies and the rising cost of imports have put power plants in a precarious situation (chart 4). About 79 of the 150 plants that depend on domestic coal had critical stocks (<25% of the required stock) as of June 15. Eight importedbased coal plants were also at critical levels.

Perennial bottlenecks

The use of imported coal will also push up the price of power supply to the power distribution companies or ‘Discoms,’ often dubbed as the weakest link in the power sector chain. Discoms owe longstanding dues to the tune of ₹ 1.16 lakh crore to the gencos. Delays in payments by discoms create a working capital crunch for generating companies which in turn inhibits them from procuring an adequate quantity of coal. According to the 201920 report by the Power Finance Corporation, discoms had accumulated losses up to ₹ 5.07 lakh crore and were therefore unable to pay generators on time. Discoms in Tamil Nadu, Rajasthan and Uttar Pradesh are the most financially stressed (see chart 5). Discoms are bleeding because the revenue they generate is much lower than their costs. This is evident from the gap between the average cost of supply and the average revenue realized (see chart 6). Tamil Nadu, Jammu and Kashmir, and Rajasthan have the widest gap between revenues and expenses of discoms. Apart from providing power at cheaper rates, some state governments do not revise tariffs periodically. Further, the delay in getting compensation from the government also compounds the woes of cashstrapped discoms.

Chart 1

The chart shows India’s total domestic coal production in million tonnes (left-axis) and energy requirement in billion units (right-axis) in the past 12 years. Hover over the chart to find the exact figure

Chart appears incomplete? Click to remove AMP mode

Chart 2

The chart shows the quantity of coal imported (million tonnes) by imported coal-based power plants and by domestic coal-based plants that use imported coal for blending. In recent years, the usage of imported coal has dwindled across both types of plants.

Chart 3

The chart shows the quarter-wise domestic and international coal prices (₹ per tonne). The price of coal in international markets was on a steep rise while domestic price remained relatively stable (as of Q2 FY22).

Chart 4

The chart shows the share of power plants that had critical coal stocks as of June 15, 2022. About 53% of power plants that depend on domestic coal and a similar share of imported coal-based plants had critical levels of coal stock.

Chart 5

The chart shows the losses accumulated (in ₹ crore) by power distribution companies (discoms) in select States in FY20. Discoms are saddled by losses every year which makes it difficult for them to pay power generating companies on time. Except for Gujarat, discoms in every other States considered recorded losses.

Chart 6

The chart shows the gap between discoms’ cost of supply and the average revenue realized (in ₹ per kWh) for every unit of energy sold in select states. For instance, for every unit of energy sold by TANGEDCO in Tamil Nadu, the discom earned ₹ 2.09 less than the cost spent on supplying it.

In Chart 6, a positive value indicates that supply costs are higher than revenues and so the utility is making a loss. A negative value indicates that the utility is making a profit

Source: CEA, PFC, Ministry of Coal, Ministry of Power, RBI, POSOCO

Also read: Data | Coal crisis: Over 100 thermal power plants have <25% of required stock

.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Back to top button

Adblock Detected

Please consider supporting us by disabling your ad blocker